Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Bender Age Project"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Agreed, but maybe it should be moved to your page, [[User:Bot Mitzvah|Bot Mitzvah]]. --[[User:Chris of the Futurama2|Chris of the Futurama2]] 01:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC) | :Agreed, but maybe it should be moved to your page, [[User:Bot Mitzvah|Bot Mitzvah]]. --[[User:Chris of the Futurama2|Chris of the Futurama2]] 01:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Indeed. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 02:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Indeed. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 02:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Indeed what? I don't ''really'' see the need for an entire article discussing Bender's age. I don't mind at all that we have an entire section devoted to the subject in his article, but his own article? Is it really that big a controversy? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 10:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:55, 15 February 2009
Self promotions in articles (except of our wiki) aren't really allowed, right? In other words, this article is hardly very ... good. Even its title for that matter. If it really were to discuss his age, would it not be named Bender Bending Rodríguez's age instead (or just Bender's age)? But that is not the case. I am holding out for a deletion. --SvipTalk 23:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed, but maybe it should be moved to your page, Bot Mitzvah. --Chris of the Futurama2 01:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. - Quolnok 02:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)